posted 12-20-2005 02:28 PM
Hi LevanThanks for your reply. You make some good points about the balance of power between church and castle owner. The taxes payable and balance of power this brought between the two are indeed interesting subjects.
One of the aspects of this church/castle relationship I was interested in is who came first to the particular site and why. Some castle sites in England that have these churches built very close by sometimes have pre-conquest (ie before 1066) remains in the church structure such as windows, doors, grave covers etc . This suggests a church was on this site before the castle was built.
Did the new lord rebuild the church at the time the castle was built or did that come later?. Presumably if the new owner was in conflict with the church (ie he wanted the same site as the church for his castle) he could simply have taken it and given the church an alternative place. But they often didn't do this - incorporating instead the church within the castle site.
There appears more to it than just power struggle between the two.
Are there continental parallels to this situation that we find in England?
Peter